Use Me Works · toy

Cupcake Fish Toy

Name: Cupcake Fish Toy
Brand: Use Me Works

Listing says “Upcycled textile waste”

Partial carbon footprint

0.00kg CO₂e

per kg of product, raw materials to the factory gate (weight not stated: add it under Change assumptions for a whole-life figure per item) · sold in India · made in India

Screening estimateData confidence: low

Where it comes from

PDF reportView listing ↗

FIG. 01

FIG. 01Where 0.00 kg CO₂e comes from: per kg of product, raw materials to the factory gate. A screening estimate from the listing and published data.

Change anything below and the footprint recalculates. What you change is marked “Stated”. Nothing here is saved.

Sold in

Made in (assumed)

Freight

Weight, kg (not stated)

Materials

Part	Material (kg CO₂e per kg)	Share %	Mass	Source
Material	Named material ⓘ		1,000 g	Estimated Contested

0.00 kgincluding carbon taken up by plants

not knowncarbon held in the product, reported apart from the total (ISO 14067 §6.4.9.3)

0.00–0.00likely range, 95%

In everyday terms, about the same as driving 0 km in a petrol car, 0 smartphone charges, or 0 tree-years of absorption.

Is this your product?Replace our defaults with your own materials, energy and supplier data.

Improve this estimate

How this was calculated

Everything behind the figure, for auditors and the curious. Built to the requirements of ISO 14040/44, ISO 14067 and PACT v3.

Standards checkISO 14040/44, ISO 14067 and PACT v3, requirement by requirement

Standards check · ISO 14040/44 · ISO 14067 · PACT v3Screening estimate: not a full footprint study

ISO 14040/14044

Does not conform

10 met · 3 not met · 1 need reviewer

ISO 14067

Does not conform

17 met · 3 not met · 1 need reviewer

PACT

Does not conform

10 met · 4 not met · 1 need reviewer

All 30 requirements, with clauses

Requirement	ISO 14040/44	ISO 14067	PACT v3
The study's purpose is written down	Met §4.2.2	Met §6.3.1	—
No public claim that one product beats another	Met §4.2.2; Amd 1 Annex C	Met §Annex A, Annex B	—
The unit is clear, and a partial footprint is labelled as such	Met §4.2.3.2	Met §6.3.3	Met §3.2.4
The system boundary is described	Met §4.2.3.3	Met §6.3.4, 7.3 b	Met §3.2.3
The time period is stated and justified	—	Met §6.3.6	Met §3.2.3
Product category rules are used where they exist	—	Met §6.2	Met §3.1.2
Anything left out is small, estimated and reported Exclusions 100.00 % of cradle-to-gate emissions (≥ 3 %). Fix: Model the largest excluded processes until the rest is under 3 %.	Met §4.2.3.3.3	Met §6.3.4.3	Not met §3.3.1.2
The data is checked for consistency	Met §4.3.2–4.3.3	Met §6.4.3	—
Own processes use measured data, or say why not	—	Not applicable §6.3.5	Not applicable §4.1.3
Every database value is referenced and fit for purpose 0.0 % of emissions use MFP screening proxies (Reused textile (upcycled saris, fabric scraps, deadstock): cut-off, no upstream burden): values compiled from cited literature, not a maintained published dataset. Fix: Replace them with a published database value or the supplier's own figure.	Not met §4.3.2	Not met §6.3.5	Not met §4.1.3.2
Shared factory burdens are split by the standard rules	Not applicable §4.3.4	Not applicable §6.4.6	Not applicable §3.3.1.4
Recycling is counted with the cut-off method	Met §4.3.4.3	Met §6.4.6.3	Met §3.3.2.2
Electricity covers its whole life cycle	Not applicable §4.3.2–4.3.3	Not applicable §6.4.9.4.1	Not applicable §3.3.2.3
Electricity follows the market-based rules	—	Not applicable §6.4.9.4.4	Not applicable §3.3.2.3, Box 7
Land-use change is counted and shown separately	—	Not applicable §6.4.9.5	Not applicable §3.3.2.4
Biogenic carbon is counted in and out	—	Met §6.4.9.2, 6.4.9.3, 6.5.2	Met §3.3.2.4
Air freight is shown separately, without radiative forcing	—	Not applicable §6.4.9.7	Not applicable §3.3.2.1
No offsets or avoided emissions	—	Met §6.3.4.1	Met §3.3.2.2
Latest IPCC warming factors (AR6, 100 years)	Met §4.4.2	Met §6.5.1	Met §3.2.2
Fossil and biogenic methane are kept apart	—	Met §6.5.2	—
Key choices are stress-tested	Met §4.5.3.3	Met §6.4.5, 6.6	—
Uncertainty is assessed	—	Met §6.6	—
Data quality is scored No data quality rating. Fix: Include emission lines.	Not met §4.2.3.6	Not met §6.3.5	Not met §4.2.2, 4.2.3
Limitations are stated	Met §4.5.4	Met §6.6, Annex A	—
Results are broken down the required way	—	Met §7.2	Met §3.3.1, data model
The study report contains every required item Report items without content: j (Data description and quality). Fix: Fill the inputs flagged in the goal-and-scope checks.	Not met §5.2	Not met §7.3	—
The PACT data file is complete Missing or invalid: companyIds, productIds. Fix: Add company and product identifiers (URNs such as urn:mfp:company:acme), the reference period and a PACT unit.	—	—	Not met §6.1; Tech Specs v3.0.3
The primary data share is reported	—	—	Met §4.2.2
Independent critical review No critical review recorded. Fix: Commission an ISO 14071 critical review before any public communication; a panel review is mandatory for public comparisons.	Needs reviewer §6	Needs reviewer §8	—
Third-party verification of the calculation model The MFP footprint calculation model has not yet been verified by a third party. Fix: Commission limited-assurance verification of the calculation model (PACT v3 §5.3.3, Tables 14–15).	—	—	Needs reviewer §5.3.3

These standards apply to studies. This checklist reports the implemented checks; it is not certification or a substitute for independent review. “Needs reviewer” items (critical review, verification of the calculation model) can only be closed by an independent third party.

Assumptions and defaults11 entries, 2 warnings

Warnings · 2

m1: Reused fabric (upcycled sari, scraps, deadstock) has no verified carbon content, so its biogenic carbon is missing from the biogenic balance.
Excluded processes = 100.00% of cradle-to-gate emissions, at or above PACT v3's 3 % cap. The PCF is NOT PACT-conformant until these are modelled.

Assumptions register · 11 entries

Screening mode: this listing gives no primary data, so every input below that is not a stated material or weight is a named screening default. The result is not PACT-conformant (primary data share 0 %).
The listing states no weight and no typical weight is on file for "toy", so the footprint is given per kilogram of product (ISO 14067 declared unit). Enter the product's weight for a per-item figure.
Country of manufacture not stated in the listing; India assumed.
m1: Reused fabric (upcycled sari, scraps, deadstock) is not in the published factor library; screening proxy proxy_reused_textile (CONTESTED, technological score 4) used.
m1: material matched from "upcycled textile" (specific, HIGH confidence): reused fabric enters without its first-life burden (cut-off); collection and sorting are not included, so the result is a lower bound.
m1: material share 100 % is estimated from the listing text.
Packaging is not stated and no verified default exists for toy, so it is excluded.
Inbound transport of materials to the factory is left out of the total, because supplier locations are unknown; its likely size is estimated and reported under the cut-off rule below.
Distribution route is a screening default (1,000 km road), carrying product plus packaging.
Cut-off rule: processes are excluded only where no verified data exists, and each exclusion is estimated where possible and reported (ISO 14044 §4.2.3.3.3). Inbound transport is estimated at 0.0626 kg CO₂e.
Sources quoted as published figures (not open-licensed datasets): screening_proxy. Replace with licensed or supplier data before external or comparative claims.

SensitivityThe figure with other published choices

Sensitivity analysis (ISO 14067 §6.4.5, §6.6)

The footprint recalculated with each alternative choice: other published factors, the other allocation method, the grid mix instead of a green-power contract, and the use profile at its uncertainty bounds. A large change shows where better data pays off first.

Line	Choice tested	Baseline	Alternative	Δ kg CO₂e	Δ %
Reused fabric (upcycled sari, scraps, deadstock)	Emission factor	Reused textile (upcycled saris, fabric scraps, deadstock): cut-off, no upstream burden	Recycled cotton fibre, mechanical, post-consumer Wendin M. / Miljögiraff (2016). LCA of recycling cotton - Life Cycle Assessment of recycling cotton (mechanically). Report number 75, Miljögiraff, Gothenburg, for H&M. Public report hosted by ESU-services. Section 4.4.2, Table 10; Abstract	+0.381	%

Every line of the calculation1 lines: activity × factor, with sources

Full inventory

Footprint = Σ activity × emission factor

Every line: how much (activity) × how much CO₂e per unit (factor), with its source. Source labels

Primary sourcePin to primaryContestedComputed

Stage	Line	Activity	× Factor	= kg CO₂e	DQR	Source
Raw materials	Reused fabric (upcycled sari, scraps, deadstock) reused_textile (virgin)	1.000 kg	0 kg/kg	0.000	4/4/1 Low · +492%	Contested Cut-off rule for recycled and reused inputs (ISO 14067:2018 6.4.6.3; PACT Methodology v3.0, recycled content approach) screening proxy · proxies.1
	Total, excluding biogenic uptake			0.000

ISO 14067 study reportSeparately reported values and report contents

ISO 14067 study report · partial carbon footprint (cradle-to-gate, declared unit)

Footprint per 1 kg (ISO 14067, incl. biogenic −1/+1)	0.0000 kg CO₂e
Net fossil GHG	0.0000 kg CO₂e
Biogenic CO₂ emissions	0.0000 kg CO₂
Biogenic CO₂ removals	0.0000 kg CO₂
Biogenic CH₄ (as CO₂e)	0.0000 kg CO₂e
Direct land-use change	0.0000 kg CO₂e
Aircraft (no radiative forcing)	0.0000 kg CO₂e
Biogenic carbon content	0.0000 kg C
Outbound logistics (reported separately)	0.0000 kg CO₂e
Raw materials	0.0000 kg · 0%
Production	0.0000 kg · 0%
Inbound transport	0.0000 kg · 0%
Packaging	0.0000 kg · 0%

Goal: application, reasons, audience, comparative assertion §6.3.1 / 14044 4.2.2	Screening carbon footprint shown on the Made for Planet catalogue so brands and buyers can see where a product's emissions come from. Reasons: No company data is available for this listing; a transparent estimate from the listing and published factors shows the likely size and the main stages. Audience: Brands and buyers (business-to-business). The estimate is also displayed on madeforplanet.com, labelled as a screening estimate; it is not an environmental claim the brand may use in marketing. Public comparative assertion: no.
Functional or declared unit and reference flow §7.3 a	Declared unit: 1 kg (partial carbon footprint); reference flow 1 kg of product.
System boundary §7.3 b	cradle to gate. Screening partial carbon footprint, cradle to gate, per kg: materials and packaging where known. Distribution, use and end of life are outside the boundary. Capital goods are excluded, as is usual for attributional product footprints. Stages modelled: raw_materials.
Significant unit processes §7.3 c	No single line above 5 %.
Data sources §7.3 d	MFP screening proxies proxies.1
Greenhouse gases considered §7.3 e	CO₂, CH₄ (fossil and biogenic), N₂O and refrigerant gases (HFCs, SF₆, NF₃) where present; secondary factors cover the gases their publishers include.
Characterisation factors §7.3 f	IPCC AR6 GWP100 with climate-carbon feedbacks; secondary factors in their published basis where no AR6 version exists (see gwp check).
Cut-off criteria and exclusions §7.3 g, o	Inbound transport of materials to the factory: 0.06261 kg CO₂e (screening estimate: 1.000 kg of materials × 500 km by average lorry (UK DESNZ GHG conversion factors 2025, Freighting goods + WTT delivery vehicles); supplier locations are not known)
Allocation procedures §7.3 h	No multi-output processes. Recycling: cut-off.
Timing of emissions §7.3 i, 6.4.8	All emissions and removals counted as at the start of the assessment period; no delayed-emission weighting.
Data description and quality §7.3 j	Missing: fill this in before issuing the report.
Sensitivity and uncertainty §7.3 k	1 sensitivity case(s); lognormal Monte Carlo on pedigree uncertainty.
Electricity treatment §7.3 l	No electricity in scope.
Interpretation, limitations §7.3 m, Annex A	Climate change only: other impacts (water, land, toxicity, biodiversity) are not assessed, so a lower footprint does not mean a lower environmental impact overall. Secondary factors limit accuracy as shown by the data-quality scores.
Value choices §7.3 n	Cut-off for recycling (PACT); economic allocation only above a 5× value ratio; conservative factor where published values disagree (see sensitivity).
Scope changes and exclusions §7.3 o	No product weight is stated, so the study is a partial carbon footprint per kg of product (cradle to gate): distribution, use and end of life are not quantified (ISO 14067 §6.3.3). Packaging is not stated and no verified default exists for this kind of product, so it is excluded without an estimate.
Life-cycle stages, use and end-of-life scenarios §7.3 p, 6.3.7, 6.3.8	Not in scope (partial carbon footprint, cradle-to-gate).
Influence of alternative scenarios §7.3 q	factor_choice m1: — %
Period the footprint represents §7.3 r, 6.3.6	2026-01-01 to 2026-12-31: current production as represented by the factor library (each factor's own data year is scored in the temporal data quality)
Product category rules §7.3 s, 6.2	No product category rules conforming to ISO/TS 14027 are known for this product category; MFP screening rules are applied and disclosed.
Performance tracking §7.3 t, 6.4.7	Not a performance-tracking study.

ISO 14067 counts biogenic removals (−1) and emissions (+1) in the carbon footprint; the PACT headline excludes biogenic uptake. Both are shown.

PACT v3 data and biogenic carbonData-exchange values and a downloadable file

PACT v3 data model (cradle-to-gate) and biogenic carbon balance

Download PACT v3.0.3 JSON ProductFootprint in the Technical Specifications v3.0.3 format (decimals as strings). Check the conformance panel before sending it.

Footprint excl. biogenic uptake	0.0000 kg CO₂e
Footprint incl. biogenic uptake	0.0000 kg CO₂e
Fossil GHG emissions	0.0000 kg CO₂e
Land-use change GHG	0.0000 kg CO₂e
Biogenic non-CO₂	0.0000 kg CO₂e
Biogenic CO₂ uptake	0.0000 kg CO₂
Fossil carbon content	0.0000 kg C
Biogenic carbon content	0.0000 kg C
Aircraft GHG (no RF)	0.0000 kg CO₂e
Packaging GHG	0.0000 kg CO₂e
Exempted emissions	100 %
Primary data share	0.0000 %
IPCC characterisation	AR6

Biogenic CO₂ uptake	0.0000 kg CO₂
Biogenic CO₂ emitted	0.0000 kg CO₂
Biogenic C stored in landfill	0.0000 kg C
Biogenic C exported to recycling	0.0000 kg C
Biogenic C in product	0.0000 kg C
Engine / factor library	1.2.0 / 2026.11-mfp.8