← Back to products
Blue Spirulina, product photo
Gunambeauty · spirulina, dried

Blue Spirulina

Listing says “Spirulina, dried”

Partial carbon footprint
0.45kg CO₂e

per pack, raw materials to the packed product · sold in India · made in India

Screening estimateData confidence: medium
Raw materials 100%
View listing ↗PDF report

Change anything below and the footprint recalculates. What you change is marked “Stated”. Nothing here is saved.

Sold in
Freight
Materials
PartMaterial (kg CO₂e per kg)Share %MassSource
Spirulina, dried
Named material ⓘ
40 gEstimated
Primary source
Raw materials100%0.45 kg
0.45 kgincluding carbon taken up by plants
not knowncarbon held in the product, reported apart from the total (ISO 14067 §6.4.9.3)
0.13–1.67likely range, 95%

In everyday terms, about the same as driving 3 km in a petrol car, 56 smartphone charges, or 0 tree-years of absorption.

Is this your product? Replace our defaults with your own materials, energy and supplier data (the biggest lever here: lightweight the design by 10%).Improve this estimate →

How this was calculated

Everything behind the figure, for auditors and the curious. Built to the requirements of ISO 14040/44, ISO 14067 and PACT v3.

Standards checkISO 14040/44, ISO 14067 and PACT v3, requirement by requirement
Standards check · ISO 14040/44 · ISO 14067 · PACT v3Screening estimate: not a full footprint study
ISO 14040/14044
Listed calculation checks passed; independent review or verification pending
13 met · 0 not met · 1 need reviewer
ISO 14067
Listed calculation checks passed; independent review or verification pending
20 met · 0 not met · 1 need reviewer
PACT
Does not conform
13 met · 1 not met · 1 need reviewer
All 30 requirements, with clauses
RequirementISO 14040/44ISO 14067PACT v3
The study's purpose is written downMet
§4.2.2
Met
§6.3.1
—
No public claim that one product beats anotherMet
§4.2.2; Amd 1 Annex C
Met
§Annex A, Annex B
—
The unit is clear, and a partial footprint is labelled as suchMet
§4.2.3.2
Met
§6.3.3
Met
§3.2.4
The system boundary is describedMet
§4.2.3.3
Met
§6.3.4, 7.3 b
Met
§3.2.3
The time period is stated and justified—Met
§6.3.6
Met
§3.2.3
Product category rules are used where they exist—Met
§6.2
Met
§3.1.2
Anything left out is small, estimated and reportedMet
§4.2.3.3.3
Met
§6.3.4.3
Met
§3.3.1.2
The data is checked for consistencyMet
§4.3.2–4.3.3
Met
§6.4.3
—
Own processes use measured data, or say why not—Not applicable
§6.3.5
Not applicable
§4.1.3
Every database value is referenced and fit for purposeMet
§4.3.2
Met
§6.3.5
Met
§4.1.3.2
Shared factory burdens are split by the standard rulesNot applicable
§4.3.4
Not applicable
§6.4.6
Not applicable
§3.3.1.4
Recycling is counted with the cut-off methodMet
§4.3.4.3
Met
§6.4.6.3
Met
§3.3.2.2
Electricity covers its whole life cycleNot applicable
§4.3.2–4.3.3
Not applicable
§6.4.9.4.1
Not applicable
§3.3.2.3
Electricity follows the market-based rules—Not applicable
§6.4.9.4.4
Not applicable
§3.3.2.3, Box 7
Land-use change is counted and shown separately—Not applicable
§6.4.9.5
Not applicable
§3.3.2.4
Biogenic carbon is counted in and out—Met
§6.4.9.2, 6.4.9.3, 6.5.2
Met
§3.3.2.4
Air freight is shown separately, without radiative forcing—Not applicable
§6.4.9.7
Not applicable
§3.3.2.1
No offsets or avoided emissions—Met
§6.3.4.1
Met
§3.3.2.2
Latest IPCC warming factors (AR6, 100 years)Met
§4.4.2
Met
§6.5.1
Met
§3.2.2
Fossil and biogenic methane are kept apart—Met
§6.5.2
—
Key choices are stress-testedMet
§4.5.3.3
Met
§6.4.5, 6.6
—
Uncertainty is assessed—Met
§6.6
—
Data quality is scoredMet
§4.2.3.6
Met
§6.3.5
Met
§4.2.2, 4.2.3
Limitations are statedMet
§4.5.4
Met
§6.6, Annex A
—
Results are broken down the required way—Met
§7.2
Met
§3.3.1, data model
The study report contains every required itemMet
§5.2
Met
§7.3
—
The PACT data file is complete
Missing or invalid: companyIds, productIds.
Fix: Add company and product identifiers (URNs such as urn:mfp:company:acme), the reference period and a PACT unit.
——Not met
§6.1; Tech Specs v3.0.3
The primary data share is reported——Met
§4.2.2
Independent critical review
No critical review recorded.
Fix: Commission an ISO 14071 critical review before any public communication; a panel review is mandatory for public comparisons.
Needs reviewer
§6
Needs reviewer
§8
—
Third-party verification of the calculation model
The MFP footprint calculation model has not yet been verified by a third party.
Fix: Commission limited-assurance verification of the calculation model (PACT v3 §5.3.3, Tables 14–15).
——Needs reviewer
§5.3.3

These standards apply to studies. This checklist reports the implemented checks; it is not certification or a substitute for independent review. “Needs reviewer” items (critical review, verification of the calculation model) can only be closed by an independent third party.

Assumptions and defaults10 entries, 1 warnings
Warnings · 1
  • Temporal scores for agribalyse_3_2 use the edition year; their underlying data are older, so those temporal scores may be better than the data deserve.
Assumptions register · 10 entries
  1. Screening mode: this listing gives no primary data, so every input below that is not a stated material or weight is a named screening default. The result is not PACT-conformant (primary data share 0 %).
  2. Country of manufacture not stated in the listing; India assumed.
  3. m1: material matched from "Spirulina" (specific, MEDIUM confidence): matched by name to AGRIBALYSE 3.2 item 11086 (Spirulina, dried).
  4. m1: material share 100 % is estimated from the listing text.
  5. Packaging is inside the AGRIBALYSE packaging stage of the food factor.
  6. Inbound transport of materials to the factory is left out of the total, because supplier locations are unknown; its likely size is estimated and reported under the cut-off rule below.
  7. Distribution route is a screening default (1,000 km road), carrying product plus packaging.
  8. m1: no landfill factor for food_11086 in the library; eol_landfill_clothing used as a proxy.
  9. Cut-off rule: processes are excluded only where no verified data exists, and each exclusion is estimated where possible and reported (ISO 14044 §4.2.3.3.3). Inbound transport is estimated at n/a kg CO₂e.
  10. Food: the factor is AGRIBALYSE 3.2's agriculture, transformation and packaging stages for the matched food, per kg as consumed in France. The value is French, not Indian; geography is scored accordingly.
Every line of the calculation1 lines: activity × factor, with sources
Full inventory

Footprint = Σ activity × emission factor

Every line: how much (activity) × how much CO₂e per unit (factor), with its source. Source labels

Primary sourcePin to primaryContestedComputed
StageLineActivity× Factor= kg CO₂eDQRSource
Raw materialsSpirulina, dried (Spirulina, dried)
food_11086 (virgin)
0.040 kg11.22
kg/kg
0.4493/5/1
Medium · +271%
Primary source ADEME/INRAE AGRIBALYSE 3.2, code AGB 11086 (Spiruline (Spirulina sp.), séchée ou déshydratée); total farm-to-plate 11.8
database · 3.2 (published Aug 2025)
Total, excluding biogenic uptake0.449
ISO 14067 study reportSeparately reported values and report contents
ISO 14067 study report · partial carbon footprint (cradle-to-gate, declared unit)
Footprint per 1 piece (ISO 14067, incl. biogenic −1/+1)0.4488 kg CO₂e
Net fossil GHG0.4488 kg CO₂e
Biogenic CO₂ emissions0.0000 kg CO₂
Biogenic CO₂ removals0.0000 kg CO₂
Biogenic CH₄ (as CO₂e)0.0000 kg CO₂e
Direct land-use change0.0000 kg CO₂e
Aircraft (no radiative forcing)0.0000 kg CO₂e
Biogenic carbon content0.0000 kg C
Outbound logistics (reported separately)0.0000 kg CO₂e
Raw materials0.4488 kg · 100%
Production0.0000 kg · 0%
Inbound transport0.0000 kg · 0%
Packaging0.0000 kg · 0%
Goal: application, reasons, audience, comparative assertion
§6.3.1 / 14044 4.2.2
Screening carbon footprint shown on the Made for Planet catalogue so brands and buyers can see where a product's emissions come from. Reasons: No company data is available for this listing; a transparent estimate from the listing and published factors shows the likely size and the main stages. Audience: Brands and buyers (business-to-business). The estimate is also displayed on madeforplanet.com, labelled as a screening estimate; it is not an environmental claim the brand may use in marketing. Public comparative assertion: no.
Functional or declared unit and reference flow
§7.3 a
Declared unit: 1 piece (partial carbon footprint); reference flow 0.04 kg of product.
System boundary
§7.3 b
cradle to gate. Screening partial carbon footprint: farming, processing and packaging per AGRIBALYSE 3.2 (French supply chain). Distribution, consumption and end of life are outside the boundary. Stages modelled: raw_materials.
Significant unit processes
§7.3 c
food_11086 (virgin) (100 %)
Data sources
§7.3 d
AGRIBALYSE 3.2 food product synthesis table 3.2 (published Aug 2025)
Greenhouse gases considered
§7.3 e
CO₂, CH₄ (fossil and biogenic), N₂O and refrigerant gases (HFCs, SF₆, NF₃) where present; secondary factors cover the gases their publishers include.
Characterisation factors
§7.3 f
IPCC AR6 GWP100 with climate-carbon feedbacks; secondary factors in their published basis where no AR6 version exists (see gwp check).
Cut-off criteria and exclusions
§7.3 g, o
No exclusions; all attributable processes modelled with available data.
Allocation procedures
§7.3 h
No multi-output processes. Recycling: cut-off.
Timing of emissions
§7.3 i, 6.4.8
All emissions and removals counted as at the start of the assessment period; no delayed-emission weighting.
Data description and quality
§7.3 j
PACT Table 12 DQR: technological 3, geographical 5, temporal 1; per-line scores, confidence and 95 % uncertainty in the inventory.
Sensitivity and uncertainty
§7.3 k
0 sensitivity case(s); lognormal Monte Carlo on pedigree uncertainty.
Electricity treatment
§7.3 l
No electricity in scope.
Interpretation, limitations
§7.3 m, Annex A
Climate change only: other impacts (water, land, toxicity, biodiversity) are not assessed, so a lower footprint does not mean a lower environmental impact overall. Secondary factors limit accuracy as shown by the data-quality scores.
Value choices
§7.3 n
Cut-off for recycling (PACT); economic allocation only above a 5× value ratio; conservative factor where published values disagree (see sensitivity).
Scope changes and exclusions
§7.3 o
None.
Life-cycle stages, use and end-of-life scenarios
§7.3 p, 6.3.7, 6.3.8
Not in scope (partial carbon footprint, cradle-to-gate).
Influence of alternative scenarios
§7.3 q
No alternatives available for the choices made.
Period the footprint represents
§7.3 r, 6.3.6
2026-01-01 to 2026-12-31: current production as represented by the factor library (each factor's own data year is scored in the temporal data quality)
Product category rules
§7.3 s, 6.2
No ISO/TS 14027 PCR is adopted; food values follow the AGRIBALYSE 3.2 method (ADEME/INRAE).
Performance tracking
§7.3 t, 6.4.7
Not a performance-tracking study.

ISO 14067 counts biogenic removals (−1) and emissions (+1) in the carbon footprint; the PACT headline excludes biogenic uptake. Both are shown.

PACT v3 data and biogenic carbonData-exchange values and a downloadable file
PACT v3 data model (cradle-to-gate) and biogenic carbon balance

Download PACT v3.0.3 JSON ProductFootprint in the Technical Specifications v3.0.3 format (decimals as strings). Check the conformance panel before sending it.

Footprint excl. biogenic uptake0.4488 kg CO₂e
Footprint incl. biogenic uptake0.4488 kg CO₂e
Fossil GHG emissions0.4488 kg CO₂e
Land-use change GHG0.0000 kg CO₂e
Biogenic non-CO₂0.0000 kg CO₂e
Biogenic CO₂ uptake0.0000 kg CO₂
Fossil carbon content0.0000 kg C
Biogenic carbon content0.0000 kg C
Aircraft GHG (no RF)0.0000 kg CO₂e
Packaging GHG0.0000 kg CO₂e
Exempted emissions0.0000 %
Primary data share0.0000 %
IPCC characterisationAR6
Biogenic CO₂ uptake0.0000 kg CO₂
Biogenic CO₂ emitted0.0000 kg CO₂
Biogenic C stored in landfill0.0000 kg C
Biogenic C exported to recycling0.0000 kg C
Biogenic C in product0.0000 kg C
Engine / factor library1.2.0 / 2026.11-mfp.8
Blue Spirulina carbon footprint: 0.45 kg CO₂e